[OpenID] Question about voting

[Santosh Rajan]

Thanks to responses from board members things are more clear to me. However
that leaves me with a couple of questions. First this is what I understood.
1. Voting is beyond the pervue of the board as suggested 
http://www.nabble.com/Fwd:--board-private--FW:--OpenID--Authorized-Voting-for-Email-Like-Identifiers-to23949301.html
here . Working group is what is required.
2. Consensus is what is required instead of voting as suggested by one board
member by quoting the following. “We reject: kings, presidents and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and running code.”

My questions is
1) How come we need to vote for a working group?
2) How come we need to vote for community board members?
Can't all this be done by consensus?

-----

Santosh Rajan
http://santrajan.blogspot.com http://santrajan.blogspot.com 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-voting-tp23954661p23954661.html
Sent from the OpenID - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.