[OpenID] CX proposal status

[Nat Sakimura]

Some members of spec council suggested rejection on the basis of (1) the
scope being too wide (2) not getting enough support from the community,
i.e., probalby on 4.2(c). Some proposers replied back to those points in
specs-council ML that (1) being usecase driven, it may look that scope is
wide but it really is not, (2) it has support from EU, Japan, and US members
and suggested a call to close on this. The call is being planned right now.

Would that be a fair summary?

=nat

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Peter Williams <pwilliams at rapattoni.com>wrote:

>  Can anyone summarize for folks here (in ~100 words) the status of the
> specs council discussion on the CX proposal?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20090113/f107629f/attachment-0002.htm>