[OpenID] Is OpenID truly user-centric and OP-independent? (WAS: Bug in OpenID RP implementations)
Nate Klingenstein
ndk at internet2.edu
Fri Jan 2 03:19:39 UTC 2009
Andrew,
You gloss over #1 as a given, but I'm not at all convinced that it
is. There are at least four strong factors I've witnessed that are
nudging the real world away from decentralization:
1) The bundling of additional personal data and added services
alongside OpenID-based authentication raises the deployment and
information bar for any who hope to be able to play. As the major
providers gear up to offer a comparable service to Facebook Connect,
I expect to see this wedge driven deeper, even if it takes the form
of an "open stack" which could hypothetically be implemented by
independent sites.
2) The most elegant solution to discovery is a direct, friendly
button. Direct, friendly buttons don't lend themselves naturally
towards very many providers. Even if text boxes were used, it's
unclear what the visual cues would be, since some providers would
rather use email addresses, some would rather use XRI/URL with OpenID
branding, and some would rather use their own branding.
3) There is no trust framework. An RP places a lot of faith in an
OP to deliver users back safe and sound, even above and beyond
properly authenticated. When dealing with single major providers,
there's some solace here, but when dealing with the broad unknown
world, it could be a little scary for a service.
4) Interoperability, or lack thereof, is pretty random. We've seen
countless demonstrations of that on this list in just the last few
months.
Without addressing these, decentralization will face a serious upward
battle. With big centralized providers, it doesn't really matter
much what the protocol under the covers is anyway.
Take care,
Nate.
On 2 Jan 2009, at 02:49, Andrew Arnott wrote:
> 1. OpenID achieves the decentralization of identity providers. Kudos.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20090102/ec64ded1/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the general
mailing list