[OpenID] rfc2817: https vs http
SitG Admin
sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com
Tue Sep 2 06:08:03 UTC 2008
>> You can use a custom session handler (not too difficult - databases work for
>> this) to set your own duration.
>
>I repeat: not if the client drops the session after five minutes.
I'm not subscribed to the cryptography list, I think I missed the
first time you said that the *client* would be dropping the session
after five minutes. I'm curious as to why the client would do this
when you explicitly set the expiry date to further than 5 minutes
into the future, too - is that to do with the client certs?
I was thinking of having to work around a server that forgets
sessions more than 5 minutes old, that's why the database. If the
*client* forgets, remembering things server-side any longer *would*
be kinda pointless, then, yeah.
>True, but entirely unrelated to SSL session duration.
True, but since I've wasted several months overall on coming up with
various ways to improve my web security before, just recently,
realizing that it's much more efficient to simply educate users about
using the appropriate passwords to indicate their desired level of
access, I'm a bit strong right now on the "Let's outsource enough
security to the users that we don't have to drive ourselves nuts on
convenience." front.
Though, to be fair, I don't (currently) have to worry about users
that don't know anything and won't learn - all of mine^1 are so
security-conscious already that I'm confident in their willingness to
use one password for "I'm at a public terminal or worried about
interception, give me limited access for a short time so I don't need
to worry about anything." and another password for "I'm at a secure
facility, give me full access and whatever security won't compromise
convenience since I probably won't need it."
It's different for most use-cases, so I'll withhold further
objections along these lines. I'm too used to not having to sacrifice
security for convenience to really be qualified on advising those who
may not enjoy such freedoms.
-Shade, burning tin
^1) In fact, most of them *exceed* my own standards, to such a degree
that some of them won't even try to log in. I haven't bothered
setting up accounts for several, because I expect that they won't try
to deal with me through the site - convincing all these people that
the *internet* is safe is one of the most conflicted, complicated,
*vexing* tasks I face :)
More information about the general
mailing list