[OpenID] SREG 1.x attributes
Martin Atkins
mart at degeneration.co.uk
Sat Nov 29 22:39:54 UTC 2008
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
>
> Which is probably because AX was supposed to take care of it. However
> SREG is widely implemented and I agree that we should make it possible
> to easily extend SREG.
>
If you make it possible to extend SREG, what you end up with is AX with
a few predefined attributes baked into the spec and no ability for those
attribute to be updated by third-parties.
I'm not sure anyone actually uses the ability for the attributes to be
updated by third-parties, so for all intents and purposes you'd just be
reinventing AX as far as I can tell.
What do you see as the value of having two parallel specs that both have
the same functionality apart from one having a feature that no-one uses?
(or are you proposing that SREG would replace AX altogether?)
More information about the general
mailing list