[OpenID] Calling OpenID 2.0 editors (wasRE:ProblemswithOpenIDand TAG httpRange-14)

[Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)]

Brendan Taylor:
>
> I'm quite frustrated by this discussion. I don't know what's causing the
> failure of understanding here.
>   
>   
I think that's because of the naming convention. Using the word "claim" 
as the authorized ID param can be confusing for some.

Example: I claim domain.com to be my ID, This is what I submit.

Response: something.com is the authorized ID. This is what was replied 
to the RP.


By using the param "claimed_id" as the authorized ID, it can confuse 
some folks. Something like "auth_id" (from authorized ID) or 
"confirmed_id" or "real_id" or "response_id" could have made it 
clearer....just not something with the word "claim" in it...I guess this 
is what happens.


-- 
Regards 
 
Signer:  	Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
Jabber:  	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog:  	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Phone:  	+1.213.341.0390
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20080313/99e2e241/attachment-0002.htm>