[OpenID] Calling OpenID 2.0 editors (was RE:Problems withOpenID and TAG httpRange-14)

Johnny Bufu johnny at sxip.com
Mon Mar 10 17:25:52 UTC 2008


On 7-Mar-08, at 5:49 PM, Brendan Taylor wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:18:10AM -0800, Johnny Bufu wrote:
>> Perhaps you should explain why your assumption (user-supplied id ==
>> claimed_id) should superceed the spec (condidering that without it
>> the spec stands).
>
> This is *not* assumed. The user-supplied ID doesn't come into it at  
> all.

Noah just acknowledged that it was assumed in the previous message,  
and his whole reasoning was based on this assumption / expectation.

I understand that it is being proposed. Besides being too late, I  
don't see a good case for it and also don't see a problem with how  
the spec works today either.


Johnny




More information about the general mailing list