[OpenID] Calling OpenID 2.0 editors (was RE:Problems withOpenID and TAG httpRange-14)

[Johnny Bufu]

On 6-Mar-08, at 8:00 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:23:04PM -0700, Brendan Taylor wrote:
>>>> If I claim <http://bytesexual.org/> as my OpenID
>>>> and this 303s to some place else it is pretty clear what my
>>>> "claimed id" is,
>>>
>>> Yes - the URL after all redirects, unless you use a different
>>> definition for claimed_id.
>>
>> Yes — according to the OpenID spec, which should probably be changed.
>>
>> Using a 303 redirect means that you don't want URI-2 to be  
>> substituted
>> for URI-1.
>
> +1

URI-1 is the User-supplied ID, which stays the same.

The part where the claimed_id comes into the scope of your statements  
needs to be clarified.

Johnny