[OpenID] Calling OpenID 2.0 editors (was RE:Problems withOpenID and TAG httpRange-14)

[Noah Slater]

On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:58:08PM +0200, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
>>   The new uri is not a substitute reference for the originally requested resource.
>>
> No, but neither does the "originally requested resource" must be the
> claimed_id

I'm sorry, can you rephrase this?

If I claim <http://bytesexual.org/> as my OpenID and this 303s to some place
else it is pretty clear what my "claimed id" is, unless that phrase carries
extra semantics which I am not aware off.

> http://john.example.com/ is the claimed_id, not a redirect. Of course
> one might submit http://john.example.com/ as the claimed_id from the
> beginning, but it's not required.

Again, sorry, I am having trouble understanding your point.

Would you mind rephrasing?

--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>