[OpenID] SReg multiple TypeURIs

[Andrew Arnott]

Forwarding to rest of list, since I forgot to Reply All...

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, David.  I know that's the only released spec.  But that spec
> doesn't even publish a TypeURI for itself, which makes it illegal for use in
> OpenID 2.0, as I understand it.  So people are using some TypeURI, I
> believe.  I wonder which one it is, since the spec you reference doesn't
> provide one.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:06 AM, David Recordon <drecordon at sixapart.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Right now SREG implementations are based off of
>> http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-extension-1_0.html.
>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:02 PM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
>>
>> What's the story with the multiple type URIs for the simple registration
>> extension?  I see various ones used and referenced.  Which one(s) are
>> important to support, and which one is the best one to use?  (Visually
>> comparing the 1.0 and 1.1 draft specs of sreg doesn't even reveal any
>> differences other than a type URI is defined in the latter).
>>
>> http://openid.net/sreg/1.0 (
>> http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-October/002056.html)
>> http://openid.net/extensions/sreg/1.1 (
>> http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-extension-1_1-01.html)
>> http://openid.net/sreg/1.1 (
>> http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-October/002056.html)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Arnott _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general at openid.net
>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joan Rivers  - "Never floss with a stranger."




-- 
Phyllis Diller  - "Never go to bed mad. Stay up and fight."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20080606/7e94f1da/attachment-0002.htm>