[OpenID] 2.0 logo? (was RE: OpenID Logo Retouched)

[Snorri]

Personally, I was for!

But now I understand that a (Important) change would be a big mistake.

Remember 1999 = Google = I found this "carnival" logo really ugly! Lol
+ 9 year after = The logo is always exactly the same! And everybody knows!
= That's what I mean with the importance of "orange" of the logo

-Snorri

-----Message d'origine-----
De : general-bounces at openid.net [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net] De la
part de Drummond Reed
Envoyé : mercredi 16 janvier 2008 05:26
À : david at sixapart.com
Cc : 'OpenID List'
Objet : [OpenID] 2.0 logo? (was RE: OpenID Logo Retouched)

David,

Last spring, the folks forming what is now the OpenID Foundation reached
rough consensus that it would be good to have a distinct logo for
2.0-enabled sites, as those sites can offer some features that 1.x does not.

We never acted on it because 2.0 took so long to go final. But now it's
2008, and the waiting game is over ;-)

Should we revisit the idea of having a 2.0-enabled version of the logo?

=Drummond 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at openid.net [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net] On
> Behalf Of David Recordon
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:30 PM
> To: Snorri
> Cc: 'OpenID List'
> Subject: Re: [OpenID] OpenID Logo Retouched
> 
> I'm not sure if tying this to OpenID 2.0 is really even that
> important, would be more concerned about creating confusion around if
> something supports 1.1 or 2.0 based solely on the logo.  I think this
> is looked at as a strong incremental improvement to the logo.
> 
> --David
> 

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general