[OpenID] We Need Less Bureaucracy But Also More Transparency

[Peter Williams]

Does the foundation resolve to deem acceptable google's privacy practices (since thats the indirect endorsement).

Can't whine about janrain without doing the same to all.

has anyone even reviewed them yet for political correctness (while facebook meantime cleansup).

Satire.

-----Original Message-----
From: SitG Admin <sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 6:31 PM
To: David Recordon <drecordon at sixapart.com>
Cc: general at openid.net <general at openid.net>
Subject: Re: [OpenID] We Need Less Bureaucracy But Also More Transparency


>I keep wanting to see us move to Google Groups

So long as we can make clear that it isn't an endorsement? ;)

I understand that Google has an interest in *their* system being
used, and offering a mere publicly searchable archive (open Gmail
account subscribed to the list) wouldn't stop users from using their
*other* systems, but the topology of such a solution resembles the
idea of UCI: instead of going with a single central interface, users
go with the list (their 'open' choice) and can login to Google with
their OpenID's to see an aggregated dataset (or, if they like what
Google is marketing, opt to upgrade to a Gmail account so they can
begin integrating their private messages with that dataset, too).

-Shade
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general