[OpenID] SREG 1.x attributes

[David Recordon]

http://www.axschema.org/types/

On Nov 30, 2008, at 11:23 PM, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:

> On 12/01/2008 12:07 AM, Shane B Weeden:
>>
>>
>> I don't have any problem with the development and promotion of AX.  
>> The point was simply that we have an SREG 1.1 spec in draft, and I  
>> can't see any good reason for it to include in the 6th paragraph of  
>> section 4 ", and all included fields MUST be taken from the set of  
>> fields defined in this specification." It appears to be boxing  
>> something in that simply doesn't require a box.
>
> Or perhaps manage a list of agreed fields which may be taken  
> depending on the purpose. This list could be extended by the  
> different OP/RPs until must likely every possible field would be  
> covered. This could get to some hundred or so, but I wouldn't mind,  
> since an OP doesn't have to answer all fields, many which will be  
> most likely optional.
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20081201/7c9b0d61/attachment-0002.htm>