[OpenID] SREG 1.x attributes

[Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)]

On 12/01/2008 12:07 AM, Shane B Weeden:
>
> I don't have any problem with the development and promotion of AX. The 
> point was simply that we have an SREG 1.1 spec in draft, and I can't 
> see any good reason for it to include in the 6th paragraph of section 
> 4 ", and all included fields MUST be taken from the set of fields 
> defined in this specification." It appears to be boxing something in 
> that simply doesn't require a box.

Or perhaps manage a list of agreed fields which may be taken depending 
on the purpose. This list could be extended by the different OP/RPs 
until must likely every possible field would be covered. This could get 
to some hundred or so, but I wouldn't mind, since an OP doesn't have to 
answer all fields, many which will be most likely optional.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20081201/e2033570/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6724 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20081201/e2033570/attachment-0002.bin>