[OpenID] Reconsidering http://openid different from https://openid

Dick Hardt dick at sxip.com
Sun Sep 16 06:56:20 UTC 2007


On 15-Sep-07, at 8:25 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote:

>
> On Sep 14, 2007, at 16:00, John Panzer wrote:
>
>> Johannes Ernst wrote:
>>> I'm one of the guys who actually maintains an ACL (Access Control  
>>> List) based on OpenID identities. The process works like this:
>>>  - Customer: hey, I'd like access to your website
>>>  - Me: sure, send me your OpenID
>>>  - Customer: foo.bar.com
>>>  - Me: adding http://foo.bar.com/ to the ACL
>>>  - Customer: hey, I tried but it doesn't work
>>>  - Me (diagnosing): that's because you entered 'https:// 
>>> foo.bar.com/' and not 'http://foo.bar.com/".
>>>
>>> This happens in a surprisingly large number of cases.
>>>
>>> No user seems to put any significance into the http vs. https as  
>>> part of their identifier; even the people who do have the  
>>> technical understanding to distinguish the two tend to fail  
>>> understanding that within this community, we treat them as  
>>> different identities.
>> I think that treating these as different identities would be a  
>> fairly major potential impersonation security problem.
>
> Exactly my point. This should be part of the spec.
>
> Editors, anybody?

I don't have a good answer, all the ones that come to mind are ugly  
and have some issue.

-- Dick


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20070915/e7654659/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the general mailing list