[OpenID] Interop (was: RE: Conformance and Interop...)

[David Fuelling]

+1.  I think Interop is a great idea, and I'd be fine if you led things in
this area.

On 5/18/07, Granqvist, Hans <hgranqvist at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> I've previously lead interops and I'll be willing to do the
> same for OpenID 2.0 provided:
>
> * This group votes in majority that interop is needed
>
> * This group sets up a schedule with deadlines:
>   ** when to freeze 2.0 spec for interop testing,
>   ** when interop scenarios need to be finalized,
>   ** when interop testing needs to be concluded for 2.0 announcement
>
>   (I think the spec should be frozen < 1 month, with
>   scenarios < 2 months, and final spec < 3 months)
>
> * There is a place off *.openid.net to keep the documents and
>   perhaps even running an "interop.openid.net" service a la
>   openidenabled.
>
> * I am joined by at least one more who is passionate about
>   interop and with solid OpenID knowledge (probably most readers
>   here) ;)
>
> What you say group?  I think the WSS interop (see attached
> document, unfortunately I could only find a draft at the moment)
> is a bit more complex than what we need for OpenID, but it's
> a good example on the level of what I think is needed.
>
> -Hans
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: general-bounces at openid.net
> > [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of Recordon, David
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:45 AM
> > To: Christopher St John; openid-general
> > Subject: Re: [OpenID] Conformance and Interop,was:Re: JanRain
> > library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID 2.0)
> >
> > I'd love to figure out how to get some good interop testing going.
> > Maybe figuring out some event we can get a majority of
> > implementers face to face would be a good way to go.
> >
> > --David
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: general-bounces at openid.net
> > [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of Christopher St John
> > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:33 PM
> > To: openid-general
> > Subject: [OpenID] Conformance and Interop,was:Re: JanRain
> > library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID 2.0)
> >
> > > Personally I think it is "good" for there to be several
> > > implementations *if* the developers work together to make sure that
> > > the implementations interoperate.
> > >
> >
> > What's up on the conformance and interop test fronts?
> > Browsing around the wiki and spec list archives (via google)
> > didn't turn up much other than an interop endpoint at
> > openidenabled.com. But I could have easily missed something,
> > pointers appreciated.
> >
> > -cks
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christopher St. John
> > http://artofsystems.blogspot.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20070521/1a0bf5ea/attachment-0001.htm>