[OpenID] Recycling OpenIDs (Was: What's broken in OpenID 2.0? (IIW session))

Evan Prodromou evan at prodromou.name
Sat Jun 9 13:47:21 UTC 2007


On Sat, 2007-12-05 at 23:17 +0200, Dmitry Shechtman wrote:

> 1. OpenID needs canonical IDs (duh!).

I strongly disagree with this.

I think OpenID works great as a loose confederation of identity
providers which have their own rules for allocating or re-allocating
identifiers.

If relying parties require some high level of authentication, we have
ways to specify that.

If anyone wants a canonical ID, they should use the i-names system,
already supported by OpenID.

I think this whole recycling-IDs issue is wrongheaded and broken.

Hands off my IdP!

-Evan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4422 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20070609/2998dd09/attachment-0002.bin>


More information about the general mailing list