[OpenID] Interop (was: RE: Conformance and Interop...)

[Granqvist, Hans]

Guido,

OpenID 2.0 specifies compatibility with 1.x so any interop 
agenda would have to cover both. Want to work with me on 
the 1.x scenarios?

-Hans


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guido Sohne [mailto:guido at sohne.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:49 AM
> To: Granqvist, Hans
> Cc: Dick Hardt; David Fuelling; general at openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Interop (was: RE: Conformance and Interop...)
> 
> Is your interop agenda only for OpenID 2.0, or is it also 
> going to include OpenID 1.x implementations?
> 
> I'd rather not implement 2.0, it appears overwrought (design 
> by committee/special interest group). Here's a toast towards 
> OpenID 1.x continuing to evolve!
> 
> -- G.
> 
> On 6/4/07, Granqvist, Hans <hgranqvist at verisign.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Excellent.
> >
> > We need some deadlines as per below.
> >
> >
> >
> >  ________________________________
> >  From: Dick Hardt [mailto:dick at sxip.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:51 AM
> > To: David Fuelling; Granqvist, Hans
> > Cc: general at openid.net General
> > Subject: Re: [OpenID] Interop (was: RE: Conformance and Interop...)
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Hans: let me know what we can do to support you coordinating!
> >
> >
> > -- Dick
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21-May-07, at 8:51 AM, David Fuelling wrote:
> >
> > +1.  I think Interop is a great idea, and I'd be fine if you led 
> > +things in
> > this area.
> >
> >
> > On 5/18/07, Granqvist, Hans < hgranqvist at verisign.com> wrote:
> > > I've previously lead interops and I'll be willing to do 
> the same for 
> > > OpenID 2.0 provided:
> > >
> > > * This group votes in majority that interop is needed
> > >
> > > * This group sets up a schedule with deadlines:
> > >   ** when to freeze 2.0 spec for interop testing,
> > >   ** when interop scenarios need to be finalized,
> > >   ** when interop testing needs to be concluded for 2.0 
> announcement
> > >
> > >   (I think the spec should be frozen < 1 month, with
> > >   scenarios < 2 months, and final spec < 3 months)
> > >
> > > * There is a place off *.openid.net to keep the documents and
> > >   perhaps even running an "interop.openid.net" service a la
> > >   openidenabled.
> > >
> > > * I am joined by at least one more who is passionate about
> > >   interop and with solid OpenID knowledge (probably most readers
> > >   here) ;)
> > >
> > > What you say group?  I think the WSS interop (see 
> attached document, 
> > > unfortunately I could only find a draft at the moment) is 
> a bit more 
> > > complex than what we need for OpenID, but it's a good 
> example on the 
> > > level of what I think is needed.
> > >
> > > -Hans
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: general-bounces at openid.net
> > > > [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net ] On Behalf Of 
> Recordon, David
> > > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:45 AM
> > > > To: Christopher St John; openid-general
> > > > Subject: Re: [OpenID] Conformance and Interop,was:Re: JanRain 
> > > > library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID 2.0)
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to figure out how to get some good interop 
> testing going.
> > > > Maybe figuring out some event we can get a majority of 
> > > > implementers face to face would be a good way to go.
> > > >
> > > > --David
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: general-bounces at openid.net
> > > > [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net ] On Behalf Of 
> Christopher St 
> > > > John
> > > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:33 PM
> > > > To: openid-general
> > > > Subject: [OpenID] Conformance and Interop,was:Re: 
> JanRain library 
> > > > licensing (was: Re: On OpenID 2.0)
> > > >
> > > > > Personally I think it is "good" for there to be several 
> > > > > implementations *if* the developers work together to 
> make sure 
> > > > > that the implementations interoperate.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > What's up on the conformance and interop test fronts?
> > > > Browsing around the wiki and spec list archives (via google) 
> > > > didn't turn up much other than an interop endpoint at 
> > > > openidenabled.com. But I could have easily missed something, 
> > > > pointers appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > -cks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Christopher St. John
> > > > http://artofsystems.blogspot.com
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > general mailing list
> > > > general at openid.net
> > > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > general mailing list
> > > > general at openid.net
> > > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > general mailing list
> > > general at openid.net
> > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> >
>