[OpenID] Interop (was: RE: Conformance and Interop...)
Granqvist, Hans
hgranqvist at verisign.com
Mon Jun 4 15:57:11 UTC 2007
Excellent.
We need some deadlines as per below.
________________________________
From: Dick Hardt [mailto:dick at sxip.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:51 AM
To: David Fuelling; Granqvist, Hans
Cc: general at openid.net General
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Interop (was: RE: Conformance and
Interop...)
+1
Hans: let me know what we can do to support you coordinating!
-- Dick
On 21-May-07, at 8:51 AM, David Fuelling wrote:
+1. I think Interop is a great idea, and I'd be fine if
you led things in this area.
On 5/18/07, Granqvist, Hans < hgranqvist at verisign.com
<mailto:hgranqvist at verisign.com> > wrote:
I've previously lead interops and I'll be
willing to do the
same for OpenID 2.0 provided:
* This group votes in majority that interop is
needed
* This group sets up a schedule with deadlines:
** when to freeze 2.0 spec for interop
testing,
** when interop scenarios need to be
finalized,
** when interop testing needs to be concluded
for 2.0 announcement
(I think the spec should be frozen < 1 month,
with
scenarios < 2 months, and final spec < 3
months)
* There is a place off *.openid.net to keep the
documents and
perhaps even running an "interop.openid.net"
service a la
openidenabled.
* I am joined by at least one more who is
passionate about
interop and with solid OpenID knowledge
(probably most readers
here) ;)
What you say group? I think the WSS interop
(see attached
document, unfortunately I could only find a
draft at the moment)
is a bit more complex than what we need for
OpenID, but it's
a good example on the level of what I think is
needed.
-Hans
> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at openid.net
> [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net ] On Behalf
Of Recordon, David
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:45 AM
> To: Christopher St John; openid-general
> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Conformance and
Interop,was:Re: JanRain
> library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID 2.0)
>
> I'd love to figure out how to get some good
interop testing going.
> Maybe figuring out some event we can get a
majority of
> implementers face to face would be a good way
to go.
>
> --David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at openid.net
> [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net ] On Behalf
Of Christopher St John
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:33 PM
> To: openid-general
> Subject: [OpenID] Conformance and
Interop,was:Re: JanRain
> library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID 2.0)
>
> > Personally I think it is "good" for there to
be several
> > implementations *if* the developers work
together to make sure that
> > the implementations interoperate.
> >
>
> What's up on the conformance and interop test
fronts?
> Browsing around the wiki and spec list
archives (via google)
> didn't turn up much other than an interop
endpoint at
> openidenabled.com. But I could have easily
missed something,
> pointers appreciated.
>
> -cks
>
>
> --
> Christopher St. John
> http://artofsystems.blogspot.com
>
_______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20070604/2f28dd8c/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the general
mailing list