[OpenID] why is xri so obtuse?
drummond.reed at cordance.net
Tue Jan 2 01:12:39 UTC 2007
From: Dmitry Shechtman [mailto:damnian at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 4:19 PM
To: 'Steve Churchill'; 'Drummond Reed'; general at openid.net
Subject: RE: [OpenID] why is xri so obtuse?
>I see. So this is essentially the same as owning a (sub)domain.
>If I don't want to spend money on registering a domain, I can just get a
>freedomain.com subdomain, such as dmitry.freedomain.com and then host any
>number of directories under that, such as dmitry.freedomain.com/friends/
>That is, until my subdomain becomes popular. Then, all of the sudden the
>domain owner will deny service, unless I pay. Naturally, the price would
>ultimately be higher than what it would have been had I registered a domain
>in the first place.
>Did I just oversimplify the concept of "free i-names"?
Dmitry, your observations apply equally to both DNS names and XRI
i-names/i-numbers. In other words, the benefits and tradeoffs of using
either delegated DNS domain names or delegated XRI i-names/i-numbers are the
same: they will typically be free, but they are not portable in the way a
global identifier is portable, and they always subject to the control of the
authority for the global identifier.
So "free community i-names" differ from "free third-level domain names" only
in the other aspects of XRI infrastructure that differ from DNS
infrastructure. On that I'm still working on my original reply to this
More information about the general