Identity Commons Steward from OpenID

[Matthew Weymar]

To whom, may I ask, is this vote open?... All subscribers to this
listserv?...

If so, aren't you vulnerable to the (presumably unlikely) risk of weird
things happening, given that the list is public?...

Also: You might want to specify a deadline for this vote?...

Or are you all quite happy to be less formal about this voting stuff?...

Matthew

On 9/15/06, Johannes Ernst <jernst+openid.net at netmesh.us> wrote:
>
> Per draft charter
>      http://wiki.idcommons.net/moin.cgi/OpenIdCharter
> and the Identity Commons deadline for initial working group formation
> by this Friday night,
>
> I'd like to:
> 1) move to adopt the charter as written at the URL above
> 2) nominate David Recordon as the OpenID working group representative
> to the Identity Commons Stewards Council.
>
> I realize this is a bit late, but in our defense, I think neither of
> the points above will turn out to be particularly controversial, and
> we DO have the objective of becoming a founding working group of the
> reconstituted Identity Commons, don't we? along the many other
> founding working groups ... raising the flag that OpenID is here and
> real. If we need to re-constitute, we can do this Saturday morning if
> need to be, but for right now, let's just make sure we get the table
> stakes in place for being a founding WG of IDC2 (hope people agree on
> this).
>
> We don't have a voting process either, as it turns out, so I propose
> that
>   1. you vote +1 or -1 SEPARATELY on each of the above motions, AND
> on this voting procedure, which I'll call "motion 3" (in addition to
> the above two motions)
>   2. that if anybody produces only one vote instead of one vote for
> the three motions separately, the same vote is applied to all three
>   3. that any motion passes if it has at least 2/3 of the votes as
> +1, AND it has more +1 votes than any "competing" motion.
>   4. you can of course make alternate motions -- call them #4 and
> such -- but keep in mind we have very little time.
>
> Obviously, success for motions 1 and 2 depend on the successful vote
> for this voting procedure (motion 3)
>
> Given that I'm making these motions, I'll of course vote +1 on all
> three.
>
>
>
>
> Johannes Ernst
> NetMesh Inc.
>
>
>
>   http://netmesh.info/jernst
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20060915/cf87fd95/attachment-0002.htm>