<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">I don't know what you did not understand. I will quote your statement below.<div><br></div><div>Quoting David. "I currently plan to contribute the Connect proposal into an OpenID Foundation Working Group. If that's undesired then I'll remove "OpenID" from the name and continue working on it elsewhere."</div>
<div><br></div><div>So I have actually supported your above statement, as a member of OIDF. Take it where you want, "elsewhere" or "anywhere". "So Be IT".</div></span><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM, David Recordon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:recordond@gmail.com">recordond@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hey Santosh,<div>I'm having a hard time understanding exactly what you're objecting to. Willing to clarify for me?</div><div><br></div><div>Twitter built a a similar flow on top of OAuth 1.0 a bit over a year ago with Eran Hammer-Lahav's input. Google proposed a similar flow dubbed "EasyHybrid" at the tech summit a few months ago (<a href="http://wiki.openid.net/f/Google+-+Smarr-EasyHybrid.pdf" target="_blank">http://wiki.openid.net/f/Google+-+Smarr-EasyHybrid.pdf</a>). And the v.Next proposals feel similar, but are reaching toward a more complex protocol.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>--David</div><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Santosh Rajan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:santrajan@gmail.com" target="_blank">santrajan@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div>As far as I am concerned if you want to take this idea elsewhere, according to what you suggested below. So be It!</div>
<div><br></div><div>In any case this idea wasn't developed at OIDF, you developed it elsewhere and now you want to "contribute" it to OpenID. Isn't the truth exactly opposite to what you are suggesting below?</div>
<div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:15 AM, David Recordon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:recordond@gmail.com" target="_blank">recordond@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote></div><div>I currently plan to contribute the Connect proposal into an OpenID Foundation Working Group. If that's undesired then I'll remove "OpenID" from the name and continue working on it elsewhere.</div>
<div>
<div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>-- <br><a href="http://hi.im/santosh" target="_blank">http://hi.im/santosh</a><br><br><br>
</div>
<br></div></div><div class="im">_______________________________________________<br>
board mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:board@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">board@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://hi.im/santosh">http://hi.im/santosh</a><br><br><br>