<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 18-Dec-08, at 11:03 AM, Brian Kissel wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div class="Section1"><div style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; "><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125); ">So if the majority of the board prefers to spend the $2K to fix the text box implementation we had originally, then that’s what we should do, and have Refresh Media start soon so that they can make the change as soon as the elections are over. If we want to do something else to save/delay costs, improve the UX, switch vendors from Refresh, etc. then those proposals should be shared with the BOD as well as alternatives to consider. If there are no other proposals to consider, then a simple vote on $2K for Refresh’s proposal should wrap this up.</span></div></div></div></span></blockquote><br></div><div>I already voted -1 to the motion.</div><br></body></html>