<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">I think I know philosophically the meaning of the term 'canonical email address' but I would like to know if it has an alternative or more exacting meaning technically speaking.<br><br>thanks,<br>-bill<br><br><br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com><br>To: "board@openid.net" <board@openid.net><br>Cc: "david@sixapart.com" <david@sixapart.com><br>Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:39:42 AM<br>Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Topic for this week's agenda<br><br>
Bill,
maybe
you
can
report
on
our
status
with
respect
to
have
canonical
e-mail
addresses
for
all
of
our
members
on
the
board
call.
I
agree
that
this
is
an
avenue
worth
exploring,
at
least
for
votes
pertaining
to
working
groups.<br><br>
Thanks,<br>
--
Mike<br><br>-----Original
Message-----<br>From:
<a ymailto="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net" href="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net">board-bounces@openid.net</a>
[mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net" href="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net">board-bounces@openid.net</a>]
On
Behalf
Of
Drummond
Reed<br>Sent:
Thursday,
March
13,
2008
9:27
AM<br>To:
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>Cc:
<a ymailto="mailto:david@sixapart.com" href="mailto:david@sixapart.com">david@sixapart.com</a><br>Subject:
Re:
[OpenID
board]
Topic
for
this
week's
agenda<br><br>+1.
Note
that
if
each
voter
had
one
canonical
email
address
associated
with<br>their
OpenID
of
record,
email
voting
would
meet
these
requirements
for
the<br>time
being.<br><br>=Drummond<br><br>>
-----Original
Message-----<br>>
From:
<a ymailto="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net" href="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net">board-bounces@openid.net</a>
[mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net" href="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net">board-bounces@openid.net</a>]
On
Behalf<br>>
Of
Nat
Sakimura<br>>
Sent:
Thursday,
March
13,
2008
1:04
AM<br>>
To:
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>>
Cc:
<a ymailto="mailto:david@sixapart.com" href="mailto:david@sixapart.com">david@sixapart.com</a><br>>
Subject:
Re:
[OpenID
board]
Topic
for
this
week's
agenda<br>><br>>
So,
what
is
the
requirement
to
the
voting
app?<br>><br>>
I
guess,<br>><br>>
1)
OpenID
Enabled.<br>>
2)
One
OpenID
is
allowed
to
vote
only
once.<br>><br>>
are
the
minimum
requirement.
Perhaps:<br>><br>>
3)
One
can
change
the
vote
before
the
deadline.<br>><br>>
is
nice,
too,
but
I
am
not
sure
if
we
really
need
it.<br>><br>>
I
do
not
think
annonymous
voting
is
needed
for
the
time
being.<br>><br>>
=nat<br>><br>>
Mike
Jones
wrote:<br>>
>
That's
true,
but
those
votes
wouldn't
qualify
under
the
IPR
policy
and<br>>
procedures
for
any
of
the
significant
decisions,
such
as
starting
a<br>>
working
group,
approving
drafts,
etc.
They're
also
not
good
enough
for<br>>
electing
board
members.<br>>
><br>>
>
What
are
you
proposing
that
these
votes
would
be
good
enough
for?<br>>
><br>>
>
--
Mike<br>>
><br>>
>
-----Original
Message-----<br>>
>
From:
<a ymailto="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net" href="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net">board-bounces@openid.net</a>
[mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net" href="mailto:board-bounces@openid.net">board-bounces@openid.net</a>]
On<br>>
Behalf
Of
David
Recordon<br>>
>
Sent:
Wednesday,
March
12,
2008
1:21
PM<br>>
>
To:
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>>
>
Subject:
Re:
[OpenID
board]
Topic
for
this
week's
agenda<br>>
><br>>
>
The
community
can
always
just
have
a
lightweight
version
of
voting.<br>>
>
Someone
makes
a
proposal,
others
+1
it,
boom
done.<br>>
><br>>
>
On
Mar
10,
2008,
at
11:41
AM,
Martin
Atkins
wrote:<br>>
><br>>
><br>>
>>
Drummond
Reed
wrote:<br>>
>><br>>
>>>
Scott
and
Bill:<br>>
>>><br>>
>>>
Per
the
thread
below,
the
question
of
when
we
will
be
opening
up<br>>
>>>
new
Working<br>>
>>>
Groups
for
specifications
is
starting
to
come
up.
I'm
not
saying<br>>
>>>
there
is
a<br>>
>>>
compelling
reason
to
do
that
yet
for
any
spec
other
than
PAPE
(and<br>>
>>>
the<br>>
>>>
Trusted
Exchange
spec
that
Nat
Sakimura
and
his
team
have<br>>
>>>
suggested),
but
I<br>>
>>>
do
think
that
OIDF
needs
to
take
a
public
stance
about:<br>>
>>><br>>
>>>
a)
The
status
of
current
WGs
(to
my
knowledge
it's
not
published<br>>
>>>
anywhere<br>>
>>>
what
WGs
exist
or
are
planned)<br>>
>>><br>>
>>>
b)
The
process
for
community
members
to
form
a
WG.<br>>
>>><br>>
>>>
Can
we
put
a
short
discussion
about
this
on
this
week's
agenda?<br>>
>>><br>>
>>><br>>
>>
It
was
my
understanding
that
the
blocker
for
this
is
that
we
have
no<br>>
>>
voting
system
through
which
we
can
hold
a
vote
for
the
creation
of
a<br>>
>>
WG.<br>>
>><br>>
>>
Obviously
that
is
in
hand
per
our
discussions
at
the
last
meeting.<br>>
>>
However,
I
guess
we
could
discuss
an
interim
plan
to
get
the
first
few<br>>
>>
WGs
up
and
running
quickly.
It'd
be
nice
if
these
could
be
up
and<br>>
>>
running
by
IIW
so
that
the
WGs
can
potentially
present
to
the<br>>
>>
community<br>>
>>
what
they've
been
up
to.<br>>
>><br>>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>>
>>
board
mailing
list<br>>
>>
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>>
>>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>>
>><br>>
><br>>
><br>>
>
_______________________________________________<br>>
>
board
mailing
list<br>>
>
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>>
>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>>
>
_______________________________________________<br>>
>
board
mailing
list<br>>
>
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>>
>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>>
><br>><br>>
--<br>>
Nat
Sakimura
(=nat)<br>>
Nomura
Research
Institute,
Ltd.<br>>
<a target="_blank" href="http://XDI.ORG">XDI.ORG</a>
Vice
Chair<br>><br>>
_______________________________________________<br>>
board
mailing
list<br>>
<a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br>>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>board
mailing
list<br><a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br><a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>board
mailing
list<br><a ymailto="mailto:board@openid.net" href="mailto:board@openid.net">board@openid.net</a><br><a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br></div><br></div></div></body></html>