[OpenID board] Fwd: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL TODAY

[David Recordon]

FYI. Thanks Mike for pulling together the call and summarizing!

--
Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
> Date: June 4, 2010 5:33:27 PM PDT
> To: "openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net" <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net 
> >
> Cc: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad at microsoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL  
> TODAY
>

> David Recordon, Allen Tom, and I just got off the specs council call  
> that we had.  While our call didn't represent a quorum of the specs  
> council, we agreed upon these points:
>
> All the proposed working groups should proceed to be formed.
> We encourage all the working groups to work together towards as a  
> seamless a whole as possible.
> There's a growing recognition that there’s substantial commonality i 
> n the mechanisms behind the artifact binding, the connect proposal,  
> and the possible evolution of the hybrid specification.
> We encourage people to join the working groups and do the actual  
> work, including implementations.
>                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> From: Chris Messina [chris.messina at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:11 PM
> To: David Recordon
> Cc: Allen Tom; Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net 
> ; Dick Hardt
> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL  
> TODAY
>
> FWIW, +1.
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> Agreed with Allen.
>
> --David
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Allen Tom <atom at yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I think we’ve had enough time to consider the new proposals, and tha 
> t all the proposed WGs should be formed.
>
> Allen
>
>
> On 6/4/10 11:52 AM, "Dick Hardt" <dick.hardt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2010-06-04, at 10:01 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> First, unless anyone voices an objection to Breno filling the  
> remaining slot, the specs council now consists of:
>                 Johnny Bufu
>                 Dick Hardt
>                 Mike Jones
>                 Breno de Medeiros
>                 David Recordon
>                 Nat Sakimura
>                 Allen Tom
>
> +1
>
>
> Second, I believe that this is the status of existing specification  
> proposals:
>                 Connect:  Proposed Fri, May 21.  Will be  
> automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
>
> I asked a number of questions about Connect that I have not yet seen  
> responses to. I think the issues need to be addressed or the  
> proposal withdrawn.
>
>                Discovery:  Proposed Fri, May 21.  Will be  
> automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
>                 Core:  Proposed Mon, May 24.  Will be automatically  
> approved on Tue, Jun 8.
>                 Attributes:  Proposed Tue, May 25.  Will be  
> automatically approved on Wed, Jun 9.
>
> Therefore, if we’re going to provide any input to the Connect and Di 
> scovery working groups before they’re automatically approved after 1 
> 5 days of inaction on our part, we need to do it today.
>
> We can also do it over email!
>
> Does anyone have concerns with Discovery, Core and Attributes? David  
> had mentioned that some used the OpenID term and some did not have  
> enough proposers. I think all those issues have now been addressed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Chris Messina
> Open Web Advocate, Google
>
> Personal: http://factoryjoe.com
> Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina
> ...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina
>
> This email is:   [ ] shareable    [X] ask first   [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-board/attachments/20100604/86859757/attachment.html>