[OpenID board] [board-private] FW: PAPE Specification Review Period Commencing

[David Recordon]

I'm sorry, but every post should be targetted at a more general  
audience. This is the front page of the OpenID website that we're  
talking about! (though it is possible to post without it showing on re  
frontpage as well)

---
Sent from my iPhone Classic.

On Oct 23, 2008, at 10:45 AM, "Mike Jones"  
<Michael.Jones at microsoft.com> wrote:

> When this is (hopefully) approved by the membership I'd be glad to  
> have us write a post targeted at a general audience, talking about  
> benefits of the spec, that the spec process is working, etc.
>
>                                -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] On  
> Behalf Of David Recordon
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:37 AM
> To: Martin Atkins
> Cc: board at openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] FW: PAPE Specification  
> Review Period Commencing
>
> Yes, I don't disagree with posting on the OpenID blog, just am
> disappointed that the time wasn't taken to write a blog post that
> would have the appeal of the blog's readership.
>
> ---
> Sent from my iPhone Classic.
>
> On Oct 23, 2008, at 10:28 AM, "Martin Atkins"
> <mart at degeneration.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Mike Jones wrote:
>>> The relevant language in the IPR Procedures document is:
>>> ·         Prominent posting (at least 14 days in advance of the be
>>> ginning of the voting period) on homepage of OIDF website (but sol
>>> ely for votes to approve Implementers’ Drafts, Final Specification
>>> s, and Errata)
>>> No, upon re-reading, it doesn’t literally say that notification of
>>> the review period must also occur via the home page, but given th
>>> at the “prominent posting” of the vote is required to be on the
>>> home page, it’s also reasonable to interpret the intent of the pro
>>> cedures to assume that the review period notification should be ju
>>> st as prominent as the voting notification, which follows it.
>>
>> Note also that it mentions the "*OIDF* website", not the OpenID
>> website. I'm not sure what constitutes the OIDF website, though. Is
>> it openid.net/foundation ?
>>
>> With that said, I don't think there's really much harm in this going
>> on openid.net where it will have more visibility to those who might
>> like to join OIDF in order to take part in this review / vote.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board