[Openid-aiim] IAM needs for Agentic AI and Path Forward
Ayesha Dissanayaka
ayshsandu at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 17:25:58 UTC 2025
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:29 PM Ayesha Dissanayaka <ayshsandu at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi everyone, Thank you for your comments and suggestions. Please keep them
> coming. I see that there have been some interesting discussions on the
> thread while I was away.
> The purpose of this brainstorming document is exactly to identify and
> commonly agree on what areas we should be focusing on from an identity and
> access management point of view when it comes to agentic AI, how to adopt
> and apply existing concepts and standards, and where we need extensions or
> innovations.
>
> I recently came across this nice article about many faces of agentic
> identities <https://cyata.ai/blog/many-faces-of-agentic-identities>,
> which discusses a behavioral classification of agents with real-world
> examples.
>
> 1. Agents acting as human counterparts
> 2. Agents acting on behalf of users
> 3. Agents acting hybrid of both above types
>
> I agree that non-deterministic and completely autonomous agents add lots
> of complexity to the existing infrastructure, but I don't think we can stop
> agents getting there with the latest technological advancements, and
> without having strict low enforcement for building and deploying such
> agents.
> However, I do believe there needs to be a responsible party (a human/an
> organization or some legally bound entity) who is ultimately responsible
> for the agent, its actions, and side-effects. The party that the agent acts
> on behalf of can be different from the party who employs the agent.
>
> As some of you mentioned above, agent's identity can be a choice of a
> service account, an application, a workload, something else, or something
> completely new. I don't like to ground agent identity to this or that yet.
> But believe Agents should have some identity to uniquely identify the
> agent, credentials (s) to prove their identity, and a responsible party.
>
> As Eve suggested, I completely agree that we could start with agents
> acting upon human delegators' command, which is the most common case today.
>
> Also, as Jeff suggested, I'm happy to improve this brainstorming document
> with the community feedback and collaboration so that we have a commonly
> agreeable base for what problems we should be solving for agent IAM, and
> what directions we should take.
> And of course, we can start a new document on agent assurance levels,
> which can be one of the many recommendations/guidelines that come out of
> AIIM-CG.
>
P.S. Please don't hesitate to edit the document
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhWC4KRO00kOPUW113ldG06Vii5dZjW3ljiV1tA0GCc/edit?tab=t.0>
with
your suggestions. It's open to community text collaboration.
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:45 PM Richard Bird via Openid-aiim <
> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
>> Operational issues and considerations:
>>
>> 1. If an agent isn’t fully autonomous, does it have agency or is it an
>> only policy bound entity? Is partial agency, agency at all?
>>
>> 2. How long post-broad acceptance of agentic AI until “human in the loop”
>> is an unsustainable transactional control model (several people in the
>> industry- example Rock Lambros - believe that answer is almost instantly.
>> That human in the loop is fundamentally unachievable except for possibly
>> only the highest risk transactions.)
>>
>> 3. A log isn’t a control mechanism, it is a post-incident investigative
>> tool. Logs are lagging indicators, not leading indicators.
>>
>> 4. What control mechanisms can or will be used when agents begin to
>> delegate to other agents? Authorization mechanisms have never been
>> controlled by identity and devops have associated authorization calls with
>> apps and app functions - not with identities and roles - either human or
>> agentic.
>>
>> 5. An immutable record of agentic actions, delegations and changes could
>> be created using blockchain - but even then the abberant or errant behavior
>> of an agent would need to generate and action or trigger as a response or
>> mitigation to that agent’s behavior - otherwise the immutable ledger is
>> just another tool for post event/incident research.
>>
>> 6. 90 plus percent of all AI exposure is external to our organizations
>> (and it seems that this percentage will remain well above 50% for the
>> foreseeable future). What does key assignment, identity ascription and
>> identity control look like for a huge class of entities that we do not have
>> direct control over? This issue is why most OEM software companies are
>> assigning service accounts to their agents instead of identities. It
>> eliminates the overhead associated with identity management and control,
>> completely. And it allows them to bypass T&C notification requirements for
>> code changes (I.e. retraining)
>>
>> Sorry for the ad hoc drive-by on this thread. Wasn't entirely sure what
>> the best way to engage was but have found this thread very interesting. Not
>> now nor have ever been a standards type - I’m an old grubby operator by
>> experience. But obviously this topic is hugely important for the future and
>> I’ve been eyeballs deep in operationalized AI for a few years now.
>>
>> Kindest,
>>
>> Richard Bird
>>
>> Rb
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 11:52 PM Sachin Mamoru via Openid-aiim <
>> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Eleanor and Tom,
>>>
>>> Can't we use AI to govern the AI? I mean, one aspect of governing could
>>> be to track the Agent's behaviour through logs. Periodical scans of these
>>> logs using AI can help us understand when the Agent malfunctions (i.e.,
>>> when it does not perform the intended behaviour), and then rectify it.
>>> Having full autonomy in Agents will be difficult to achieve, especially
>>> since, ultimately, IAM is zero trust. In the chain of command, there should
>>> always be at least one human being to oversee this.
>>>
>>> Sachin.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 at 10:49, Tom Jones via Openid-aiim <
>>> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> interesting question - is there ever any reason what-so-ever for a full
>>>> autonomous agent. I hope the short term answer is no.
>>>>
>>>> What is important is that a message sent from the agent must be clear.
>>>> Let's try to start with the assumption that any message from any agent
>>>> must include at least one delegation of authority if an action is to be
>>>> undertaken.
>>>>
>>>> Peace ..tom jones
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 7:26 PM Eleanor Meritt <ehmeritt at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At the most fundamental level we need to agree on what autonomy means
>>>>> for AI agents. Does that mean there is no logging of their behaviors? No
>>>>> monitoring? No failure handling? No intervention if “something goes wrong”?
>>>>> My gut feeling is that AI agents should always be monitored by humans as -
>>>>> and Ayesha said it - there is no guarantee that they will behave in the
>>>>> same way twice for the same requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then - getting philosophical - can we agree that every AI agent should
>>>>> always have an ultimately responsible human owner?
>>>>>
>>>>> Until we agree on fundamentals like this one, we won’t get very far on
>>>>> defining AIIM standards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eleanor.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 1:44 PM Lombardo, Jeff via Openid-aiim <
>>>>> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can thank Ayesha for putting forward the idea of baes that
>>>>>> can define the relation in between an human and an agent, an agent and a
>>>>>> resource.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is space for improvement on this first Draft for sure, Ayesha
>>>>>> candidly opened her text and requested feedback from this group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe the best approach is to propose new formulation for the mental
>>>>>> model and text description of it, with at heart to remind that this
>>>>>> Community Group is here to expose and document the current state and what
>>>>>> needs to be done for the best state with whatever exist today or need to be
>>>>>> created tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this vein (pun intended), I think we should:
>>>>>> - comment wherever needed on Ayesha document to make it more robust
>>>>>> - start a new document on Agentic Assurance Levels
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Jean-François “Jeff” Lombardo* | Amazon Web Services
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Architecte Principal de Solutions, Spécialiste de Sécurité
>>>>>> Principal Solution Architect, Security Specialist
>>>>>> Montréal, Canada
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ( +1 514 778 5565
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Commentaires à propos de notre échange? **Exprimez-vous **ici*
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/feedback.aws.amazon.com/?ea=jeffsec&fn=Jean*20Francois&ln=Lombardo__;JQ!!Pe07N362zA!0k9CkAV8Djpw_8EfIAKrbhP3TQrJr0oMnznlUgBJ3V3NoEk6hihx7dNHnQuejn6SSH2CP8Iow3G-tTzppHeg$>
>>>>>> *.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Thoughts on our interaction? Provide feedback **here*
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/feedback.aws.amazon.com/?ea=jeffsec&fn=Jean*20Francois&ln=Lombardo__;JQ!!Pe07N362zA!0k9CkAV8Djpw_8EfIAKrbhP3TQrJr0oMnznlUgBJ3V3NoEk6hihx7dNHnQuejn6SSH2CP8Iow3G-tTzppHeg$>
>>>>>> *.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Openid-aiim <openid-aiim-bounces at lists.openid.net> *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Tom Jones via Openid-aiim
>>>>>> *Sent:* July 20, 2025 10:29 PM
>>>>>> *To:* Eve Maler <eve at vennfactory.com>
>>>>>> *Cc:* Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones at gmail.com>; peace at acm.org;
>>>>>> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [EXT] [Openid-aiim] IAM needs for Agentic AI and Path
>>>>>> Forward
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization.
>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
>>>>>> and know the content is safe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *AVERTISSEMENT*: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur
>>>>>> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous
>>>>>> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas
>>>>>> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization.
>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
>>>>>> and know the content is safe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those ideas are completely broken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If an agent, on behalf of a legal person, is allowed to order and pay
>>>>>> for goods, then a legal contract was created and satisfied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anything else is not agency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the question is, do we have an agent or not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/agent
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace ..tom jones
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 9:56 AM Eve Maler <eve at vennfactory.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feeling philosophical today: Is there room to square this circle?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There’s an emerging field of relational AI (vs. transactional —
>>>>>> behaviors vs. actions). I’ve been talking to the developer
>>>>>> <https://kaystoner.substack.com> of a number of custom GPTs that are
>>>>>> aligned with very precisely drawn personas — and, yes, have also been
>>>>>> playing with some of them. The outputs are indeed variable but the
>>>>>> behaviors are designed to provide certain kinds of interactive support.
>>>>>> Their design also includes some guardrails and some level of transparency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe what needs to come first, before we can trust a
>>>>>> high-autonomy-level transactional agent, is measurable behavioral alignment
>>>>>> with their human delegator (Agentic Assurance Level? :-) ). Perhaps only
>>>>>> then can we start to assess the alignment of any actions that agent takes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Human delegates are not immune to misalignment with their delegator,
>>>>>> of course, which is why agency law and the concept of fiduciary duty exist.
>>>>>> I doubt AI agents will win humanlike legal status any time soon, but if
>>>>>> they are ever to get anywhere near it, they’ll need to solve these sorts of
>>>>>> issues.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eve
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eve Maler, president and founder
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cell and Signal +1 (425) 345-6756 <+1-425-345-6756>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2025, at 12:33 PM, Tom Jones via Openid-aiim <
>>>>>> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> non-deterministic agents do present serious challenges to *trust*,
>>>>>> *security*, and *governance*. In domains like digital identity, law,
>>>>>> finance, and public infrastructure, *unpredictability* isn't just
>>>>>> inconvenient—it’s potentially *unacceptable*. Let’s break down why:
>>>>>> ⚠️ *Why Non-Determinism Breeds Unacceptability*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Inconsistent behavior*: Agents that act differently under the
>>>>>> same conditions can’t be reliably audited or certified.
>>>>>> - *Untraceable outputs*: It becomes hard to pinpoint cause,
>>>>>> responsibility, or compliance status.
>>>>>> - *Vulnerability to manipulation*: Adversaries can exploit
>>>>>> probabilistic logic to induce unwanted outcomes.
>>>>>> - *Loss of control*: Especially in systems involving user consent
>>>>>> or legal transactions, determinism enables meaningful boundaries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The above is what a bing bot thinks of this idea. I agree with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace ..tom jones
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 10:19 AM Ayesha Dissanayaka <
>>>>>> ayshsandu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your input. Of course, defining an agent is a top
>>>>>> priority when considering IAM. It's the very first term in the taxonomy
>>>>>> document
>>>>>> <https://github.com/openid/cg-ai-identity-management/blob/main/deliverable/taxonomy.md> that
>>>>>> the CG is constructing. 😃
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Major AI framework providers have their definitions for AI agents, as
>>>>>> I tried to summarize here.
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhWC4KRO00kOPUW113ldG06Vii5dZjW3ljiV1tA0GCc/edit?tab=t.1iyru8xdjt9u>.
>>>>>> We can draw some inspiration from them when constructing a definition for
>>>>>> the AI agents in the context of IAM for Agents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On your suggestion for the agent definition, the term "consistent
>>>>>> behavior" might not go well with an agent, as agents are, by
>>>>>> design, undeterministic and dynamic. If you ask an agent to do the same
>>>>>> thing twice, there is a fair chance that it will do the task differently,
>>>>>> unlike a traditional application or a workload.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 12:19 AM Tom Jones <
>>>>>> thomasclinganjones at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you talk about giving ai agents and id, but there appears to be no
>>>>>> definition of what an agent must be to deserve an ID.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's do that - how about this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An agent is a persistent collection of software and language models
>>>>>> together in a workload with a consistent behavior (identity) for the
>>>>>> duration of the validity of an assigned Identifier.
>>>>>> An agent can be delegated authority by Entities, that is by named
>>>>>> objects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace ..tom jones
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:49 AM Ayesha Dissanayaka via Openid-aiim <
>>>>>> openid-aiim at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, everyone, for your comments on the thoughts on the doc. And I
>>>>>> had a great time discussing this during the CG meeting yesterday. Following
>>>>>> up on our discussion i
>>>>>> <https://github.com/openid/cg-ai-identity-management/wiki/20250717-%E2%80%90-Meeting-notes:-July-17,-2025#ayeshas-agent-identity-discussion-iam-need-for-agentic-ai---brainstorming>n
>>>>>> the last CG meeting, I am moving this conversation to email so that it's
>>>>>> easier to comment and gather thoughts from everyone. Please refer to
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhWC4KRO00kOPUW113ldG06Vii5dZjW3ljiV1tA0GCc/edit?tab=t.0>
>>>>>> documen
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhWC4KRO00kOPUW113ldG06Vii5dZjW3ljiV1tA0GCc/edit?tab=t.0>t
>>>>>> for detailed information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The complexity of AI-native applications, when considering GenAI,
>>>>>> has progressed in added stages of complexity :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. *Task-Specific AI:* Simple applications using LLMs for
>>>>>> specific tasks like text generation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. *RAG-Enabled AI:* Applications that can access and synthesize
>>>>>> external knowledge bases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. *Apps that include Agents:* Applications where agents can make
>>>>>> decisions and execute tasks on a user's behalf.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. *Agent Teammates:* The current frontier, where agents act on
>>>>>> their own accord and collaborate with humans in shared workflows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This evolution presents exciting opportunities, but it also brings a
>>>>>> new set of challenges, particularly in how we manage identity and access.
>>>>>> To ensure we build a secure and trustworthy ecosystem for these agents, we
>>>>>> need to establish a robust set of IAM best practices.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are some of the key requirements that we should be thinking
>>>>>> about:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Seamless Integration:* Agents need to interact with existing
>>>>>> systems, like those using OAuth, with minimal disruption.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Flexible Action:* Agents should be able to act on their own or
>>>>>> securely on behalf of a user or another entity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Just-in-Time Permissions:* To mitigate risks from the
>>>>>> non-deterministic nature of agents, we need mechanisms for granting
>>>>>> just-enough access, precisely when it's needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Clear Accountability:* There must be a designated responsible
>>>>>> party for an agent's actions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Auditable Traceability:* All agent actions should be traceable
>>>>>> back to their identity and the delegating authority.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Agent-Specific Controls:* Resource servers may need to
>>>>>> identify and apply specific controls for actions initiated by agents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - *Lifecycle Management:* We need clear governance for the entire
>>>>>> lifecycle of an agent, from onboarding to decommissioning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a pivotal moment for us to lead the way in defining the
>>>>>> standards and best practices that will shape the future of agentic AI. To
>>>>>> get the ball rolling, let's consider a few key questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Where can we apply * existing standards and best practices*?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. What are the *novel problems* that existing solutions can't
>>>>>> address?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3. Where do we need to *extend current standards or innovate*?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4. How should an *agent's identity* be defined and structured?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5. Develop a shared vocabulary for scenarios, actors, and
>>>>>> challenges.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Happening at
>>>>>> https://github.com/openid/cg-ai-identity-management/blob/main/deliverable/taxonomy.md
>>>>>> as initiated at AIIM-CG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please share your thoughts, any references, and any ideas you might
>>>>>> have on the above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to continuing the discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:04 PM Ayesha Dissanayaka <
>>>>>> ayshsandu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Alex, for the comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 8:41 PM Alex Babeanu <
>>>>>> alex.babeanu at indykite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Added some comments to the doc, thanks for sharing Ayesha. This could
>>>>>> serve as a starting point for discussion...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A side question, could we use a common share drive to such docs or
>>>>>> material ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, if the CG has such a shared space, I can move the doc there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Athul <atul at sgnl.ai>, do we have any such for the AIIM CG?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./\.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 10:56 AM Ayesha Dissanayaka <
>>>>>> ayshsandu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's great to be part of this exciting community to discuss IAM for
>>>>>> the Agentic Era.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bubbling up a discussion in the Slack channel, I'm sharing this
>>>>>> analysis on emerging IAM challenges from Agentic AI
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhWC4KRO00kOPUW113ldG06Vii5dZjW3ljiV1tA0GCc/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.secnaj745bir>
>>>>>> systems that now function as autonomous workforce members, and how we can
>>>>>> approach addressing them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd love to hear working groups' thoughts on this, and collaborate to
>>>>>> extend this work to commonly identify the IAM problems we need to be
>>>>>> solving for agentic AI systems and how.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to discuss these findings at an upcoming meeting. Till
>>>>>> then, let's collaborate on the mailing list and in the doc
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhWC4KRO00kOPUW113ldG06Vii5dZjW3ljiV1tA0GCc/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.secnaj745bir>
>>>>>> itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Ayesha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>>>>>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Alex Babeanu*
>>>>>> Lead Product Manager, AI Control Suite
>>>>>>
>>>>>> t. +1 604 728 8130
>>>>>> e. alex.babeanu at indykite.com
>>>>>> w. www.indykite.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>>>>>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>>>>>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>>>>>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>>>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Sachin Mamoru
>>> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2
>>> +94771292681
>>> | sachinmamoru.me <https://sachinmamoru.me>
>>> sachinmamoru at gmail.com <sachinmamoru at gmail.com>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sachin-mamoru/>
>>> <https://twitter.com/MamoruSachin>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>>
>> --
>> Openid-aiim mailing list
>> Openid-aiim at lists.openid.net
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-aiim
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-aiim/attachments/20250722/344b50fc/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 16340 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-aiim/attachments/20250722/344b50fc/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Openid-aiim
mailing list