[OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

[Ashish Jain]

I still don't understand / agree with the objection on openid-specs-native-sso.
That's the intent and the primary use case. It will be far more appealing /
understandable to the mobile app developers than 'single authorization
agent'.
-- Ashish


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Paul Madsen <paulmadsen at rogers.com> wrote:

>  oh and I guess I should have mentioned the plans for a PRISMA subgroup
> ......
>
>  On 7/17/13 7:51 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>
> Ok you have a point. NSAA then.
>
> I want it in red.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2013-07-17, at 7:28 PM, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges at KingsMountain.com> <Jeff.Hodges at KingsMountain.com> wrote:
>
>
>  request that the name be changed to "Native Single Authorization Agent", with
> the mailing list name openid-specs-nssa
>
>  but "Native Single Authorization Agent" yields "nsaa" rather than "nssa", yes?
>
> thus "openid-specs-nsaa" ?
>
> =JeffH
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing listspecs at lists.openid.nethttp://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>  _______________________________________________
> specs mailing listspecs at lists.openid.nethttp://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20130718/33ad38e2/attachment.html>