[OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

Anthony Nadalin tonynad at microsoft.com
Wed Jul 17 20:59:49 UTC 2013


Because we can, and you asked for next steps and before that there was a call for comments on the charter and I submitted the same issue on the name at that time.

From: Paul Madsen [mailto:paulmadsen at rogers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:56 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Anthony Nadalin; Don Thibeau; John Bradley; specs at openid.net; John Ehrig
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

this reminds me of the IETF SCIM-reacronymizing exercise

the group was approved & chartered under the name 'Native SSO' . Those who understand what the intent of the work is all agree that the name is an accurate description of the work.

Tony didnt like the name as proposed in the charter - but it was approved nonetheless.

So why are we still arguing?

paul

ps. I wonder if the proposers of 'Backplane', or ' AB/Connect' ,both wonderfully descriptive, faced the same
On 7/17/13 3:07 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
So you'd prefer that the work be called something closer to "Native Application Authorization"?

From: Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:50 AM
To: Paul Madsen; Don Thibeau
Cc: Mike Jones; John Bradley; specs at openid.net<mailto:specs at openid.net>; John Ehrig
Subject: RE: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

I would have been too young back in the 90s

I don't like SSO in the name as this is basically this is just a way to authorize an app to interact with one or more resource serves on your behalf

From: Paul Madsen [mailto:paulmadsen at rogers.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Don Thibeau
Cc: Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; John Bradley; specs at openid.net<mailto:specs at openid.net>; John Ehrig
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

I am 99% confident that *our* beloved Tony was not part of the R&B group from Oakland, briefly popular in the 90s.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony!_Toni!_Ton%C3%A9<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony%21_Toni%21_Ton%C3%A9>!
On 7/17/13 2:33 PM, Don Thibeau wrote:
Paul

I don't think "Tony Tony Tony"  is a good name for a working group :)

Don Thibeau
The OpenID Foundation<http://openid.net>



On Jul 17, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Paul Madsen wrote:

Tony Tony Tony, how I've missed our time together

The WG's mandate is to profile OIDC to enable an SSO model for native mobile applications.

Can you suggest a better (concise & memorable) descriptor for a mail list identifier?

paul
On 7/17/13 2:17 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
That's a totally useless name

From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net> [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Paul Madsen
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:59 AM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: John Bradley; specs at openid.net<mailto:specs at openid.net>; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

that list name is fine

thanks
On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
John, are you able to create the new mailing list at lists.openid.net<http://lists.openid.net> or do we have to ask support at osuosl.org<mailto:support at osuosl.org> for the list creation?

Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to have?  openid-specs-native-sso?

                                                            -- Mike

From: Don Thibeau [mailto:don at oidf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM
To: Paul Madsen
Cc: n-sakimura; John Ehrig; openid-specs at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs at lists.openid.net>; John Bradley; Mike Jones
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign process for IPR collection.  If done right away it saves all concerned lots of time and hassle.


Don Thibeau
The OpenID Foundation<http://openid.net/>



On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote:




Thanks Nat,

Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG list & page logistics?

Paul
On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:
The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of the OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009.

A new mailing list should be established promptly per section 4.3 of the above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set up at openid.net<http://openid.net/>. You should also ask the secretary of the foundation to announce the first meeting of the WG, in which scope approval and the chairs selection should be done.

Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has collected the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may not be as quick as you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW, NRI's agreement is already in as we have a blanket agreement like Google.

Nat

(2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote:



Next steps?

-----------
Paul Madsen
Ping Identity

Anthony Nadalin<tonynad at microsoft.com><mailto:tonynad at microsoft.com>  wrote:




I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for IPR from both Apple and Facebook.

-----Original Message-----
From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net> [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of n-sakimura
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM
To: openid-specs at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs at lists.openid.net>
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

Could you kindly spell it out?

 From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued thing that we have, and iOS's native login support given to facebook, twitter, and Weibo.
Perhaps you are thinking of something else.

Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read
    https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/
and

http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233

as well.

Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it is a task for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to go and ask Apple to open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do not know if they are going to listen, but still, it might be our duty to try.

Nat

(2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote:



I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the Facebook SSO
(iOS) IPR with this effort.



--
Nat Sakimura (n-sakimura at nri.co.jp<mailto:n-sakimura at nri.co.jp>)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Tel:+81-3-6274-1412<tel:+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547

PLEASE READ:
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system.
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at lists.openid.net<mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs



_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at lists.openid.net<mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20130717/0c29c3ea/attachment.html>


More information about the specs mailing list