RE: Implementer's Drafts posted with -ID1 version designations

Paul E. Jones paulej at packetizer.com
Fri Mar 30 17:17:06 UTC 2012


Gee, guys. I think something has gone terribly wrong here.  I was really
excited about OpenID, believing it was a very important technology.
Further, OpenID was fairly simple.  One part was complex: the client code
for the RP had to deal with querying the user's ID, looking for a Yadis
file, and possibly digging through an HTML document - all in an effort to
find the URI for the user's OP.  The OP code, on the other hand, is fairly
trivial.

 

OpenID 2.0 could have been simplified easily be removing the requirement for
processing a Yadis file and HTML document and replacing that with a simple
Link header in HTTP.  One could also use RFC 6415 (Host-Meta) to make it
simple to advertise one's OpenID ID (a "challenge" for the average person to
use) and even the OP URI (though perhaps not so beneficial).

 

I wanted to get engaged in the work, but getting Cisco to sign agreements,
especially when this was not my core job function, was a bit of a challenge.
So, the work proceeded without me.  It's unfortunate, because my initial
reaction to what I've seen is ... what happened?!?!

 

OpenID Connect was supposed to be simple.  That was one of the claim made
when it was introduced.  Looking at these drafts, I'd argue that "simple"
has been thrown out the window, in spite of the claim "simple" in the
abstract of these documents.  Perhaps it's just a false first impression,
but these documents certainly appear to introduce a lot of procedure and
make reference to number of required specifications that are not listed in
the list below.

 

Do you really want to go down this path?  I would still be open to a
simplification of OpenID 2.0 to remove the pain points.

 

Paul

 

From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net
[mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 8:36 PM
To: specs at openid.net
Cc: board at openid.net
Subject: Implementer's Drafts posted with -ID1 version designations

 

The approved Implementer's Drafts are now also posted at these locations:

.         http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-basic-1_0-ID1.html

.         http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0-ID1.html

.         http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0-ID1.html

.         http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-messages-1_0-ID1.html

.         http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-standard-1_0-ID1.html

.
http://openid.net/specs/oauth-v2-multiple-response-types-1_0-ID1.html

 

The original versions with numeric version designations remain in place.

 

                                                            -- Mike

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20120330/688fddc4/attachment.html>


More information about the specs mailing list