Charter submission for Account Chooser Working Group

[Eric Sachs]

Yep, that was one of the specific things I am going to continue to try to
recruit participants to work on once we get farther along.  Is there
anything in the charter that you think precludes the ability for the WG to
include that in the scope?

Unfortunately I still have not been able to get any proposer or planned
participant to show significant commitment to working with Google in that
area :-(  Maybe I'll have more luck at IIW.

In any case Google is going to continue to work on publicly documenting the
approaches we use.  I am hoping that if we have something more "meaty" it
might attract some others to contribute in this area.  In the meantime I am
open to other ideas about how to get some momentum in this area.

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad at microsoft.com>wrote:

>  As I indicated before, would like to see the server side be included in
> the scope, we want this to be successful and not go into the failure points
> that cardspace did. Without the server side I believe that this will not be
> as successful and as interoperable as needed****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Eric Sachs [mailto:esachs at google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, September 12, 2011 2:16 PM
>
> *To:* Anthony Nadalin
> *Cc:* Mike Jones; Christopher Messina; John Bradley; OpenID Specs Mailing
> List; Chuck Sievert; Basheer Tome; Kevin Long; Andrew Dahley; Don Thibeau;
> Wei Tu
> *Subject:* Re: Charter submission for Account Chooser Working Group****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks to everyone on the specs council who provided feedback.****
>
> ** **
>
> By default the proposal becomes "deemed accepted" tomorrow which is 15 days
> after submission.  A mailing list has been created for the new working group
> ****
>
>  http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ac****
>
>  I had planned on announcing the mailing list at the OpenID Summit
> tomorrow at the account chooser session.****
>
> ** **
>
> If anyone has any final feedback on the charter before such an
> announcement, feel free to grab me at the OpenID Summit today if you are in
> attendance, or just post email to this thread.****
>
> ** **
>
> According to the OIDF Process Document<http://openid.net/wordpress-content/uploads/2010/01/OpenID_Process_Document_December_2009_Final_Approved.pdf>"the first obligation of a new WG is to establish and approve its Scope,
> which should broadly describe the outer limits of the WG’s work."  A number
> of the comments from the spec council were about the scope, so once we get a
> good sized group on the mailing list I am going to summarize some of that
> council feedback to see if we can attract more participants to expand the
> scope.****
>



-- 
Eric Sachs | Senior Product Manager | esachs at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20110912/8a32486a/attachment.html>