OpenID v.Next Core Protocol Charter

[Anthony Nadalin]

Hard to say active usage but its deployed with every instance of Vista. It's not near the OpenID usage but it's not near zero either.

From: David Recordon [mailto:recordond at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: Allen Tom; Dick Hardt; OpenID Specs Mailing List
Subject: Re: OpenID v.Next Core Protocol Charter

Do you have statistics that can be shared around deployment and active usage of Cardspace?

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad at microsoft.com<mailto:tonynad at microsoft.com>> wrote:
There are, Cardspace is one of them where a built in OP would be an option

From: openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net> [mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-bounces at lists.openid.net>] On Behalf Of Allen Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:54 PM
To: Dick Hardt; OpenID Specs Mailing List
Subject: Re: OpenID v.Next Core Protocol Charter

Hi Dick,

I think I agree with most of the stated goals, but I'm not quite sure about supporting active clients with OP functionality.  Are there examples of such clients today?

Allen


On 5/19/10 8:36 AM, "Dick Hardt" <dick.hardt at gmail.com<http://dick.hardt@gmail.com>> wrote:

*      enable support for a spectrum of clients, including passive clients per current usage, thin active clients, and active clients with OP functionality,

_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at lists.openid.net<mailto:specs at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20100523/dcdc0c74/attachment.html>