Attribute Exchange 2.0

[Chris Obdam]

For the time-being is it possible to extend axschema.org? Dick?

Cheers,

Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)

Op 17 sep 2009, om 04:06 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven:

> I am in favour of this being international.
>
> One reason for OIDs :)
>
> Lots of people have taken runs at this over the years.
>
> If people are serious about nailing down the semantics as well as  
> the URI it may be worth the effort.
>
> I will one up your Kantara with a OASIS WG.  That could go to the  
> ISO/ITU-T as well.
>
> I am not opposed to Kantara but would like to draw out peoples  
> opinions.
>
> John B.
>
>
> On 2009-09-16, at 9:05 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> MS an the US Gov agree on a place for this is as important as other  
>> governments and telcos as well. ISO or ITU-T could be one place,  
>> but that would be too heavy weight. Using a place like Kantara,  
>> which is very light weight in starting a WG and has telco and other  
>> gov participation, as an interim home towards ISO/ITU-T seem like a  
>> good option to me.
>>
>> =nat
>>
>> John Bradley wrote:
>>>
>>> I have to say that this is the most interest I have seen in the  
>>> topic for a while.
>>>
>>> I am a Kantara member as well.  However I know not everyone is  
>>> 100% onboard with it being a neutral place.  Nat I know you try  
>>> your best to achieve that.
>>>
>>> I would like to see everyone including MS and the US Gov agree on  
>>> a place for this.
>>>
>>> That could be Kantara but I don't want to pre judge the sentiment.
>>>
>>> John B.
>>> On 2009-09-16, at 8:38 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>>>
>>>> In Japan, we are starting the work to make a matching table for  
>>>> selected SAML metadata (selected by Mobile Contents Forum: about  
>>>> 600 of them) and OpenID AX schema. For this kind of thing, it is  
>>>> quite important to involve telco as well, IMHO. In this regard,  
>>>> as a forum, Kantara seems to be one of the good place to do.
>>>>
>>>> As to the URL, I prefer shorter one, but axschema.org does not  
>>>> represent a short URL to me.
>>>> Something akin of bit.ly etc. is much shorter. Having said that,  
>>>> I am ok with axschema.org as well, if it can be transferred to an  
>>>> international non-profit.
>>>>
>>>> =nat
>>>>
>>>> Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org blessed (perhaps by  
>>>>> the OIDF)?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <john.bradley at wingaa.com 
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Good point.  It would be nice to have one place to document  
>>>>>> schema.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The ICF has a claims dictionary as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we could consolidate that would be an improvement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross  
>>>>>> protocol.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something  
>>>>>> on our own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John B.
>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> axschema.org is shorter then schemas.openid.net and implies the
>>>>>>> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> given that though, I don't have a strong preference
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use  
>>>>>>>> schemas.openid.net.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view,   
>>>>>>>> or do
>>>>>>>> you see axshema.org continuing in some way?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John B.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dick,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that  
>>>>>>>>> anyone else
>>>>>>>>> contributed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who controls axschema.org now?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do personally
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> specs mailing list
>>>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090917/a14f13aa/attachment.htm>