Attribute Exchange 2.0

[Nat Sakimura]

Besides, the participation is free there in Kantara, which is a big plus.

=nat

Nat Sakimura wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> MS an the US Gov agree on a place for this is as important as other
> governments and telcos as well. ISO or ITU-T could be one place, but
> that would be too heavy weight. Using a place like Kantara, which is
> very light weight in starting a WG and has telco and other gov
> participation, as an interim home towards ISO/ITU-T seem like a good
> option to me.
>
> =nat
>
> John Bradley wrote:
>> I have to say that this is the most interest I have seen in the topic
>> for a while.
>>
>> I am a Kantara member as well. However I know not everyone is 100%
>> onboard with it being a neutral place. Nat I know you try your best
>> to achieve that.
>>
>> I would like to see everyone including MS and the US Gov agree on a
>> place for this.
>>
>> That could be Kantara but I don't want to pre judge the sentiment.
>>
>> John B.
>> On 2009-09-16, at 8:38 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>>
>>> In Japan, we are starting the work to make a matching table for
>>> selected SAML metadata (selected by Mobile Contents Forum: about 600
>>> of them) and OpenID AX schema. For this kind of thing, it is quite
>>> important to involve telco as well, IMHO. In this regard, as a
>>> forum, Kantara seems to be one of the good place to do.
>>>
>>> As to the URL, I prefer shorter one, but axschema.org
>>> <http://axschema.org> does not represent a short URL to me.
>>> Something akin of bit.ly etc. is much shorter. Having said that, I
>>> am ok with axschema.org <http://axschema.org> as well, if it can be
>>> transferred to an international non-profit.
>>>
>>> =nat
>>>
>>> Breno de Medeiros wrote:
>>>> So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org <http://axschemas.org> blessed (perhaps by the OIDF)?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <john.bradley at wingaa.com> wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> Good point.  It would be nice to have one place to document schema.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ICF has a claims dictionary as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we could consolidate that would be an improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross protocol.
>>>>>
>>>>> openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something on our own.
>>>>>
>>>>> John B.
>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>> axschema.org <http://axschema.org> is shorter then schemas.openid.net <http://schemas.openid.net> and implies the
>>>>>> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
>>>>>>
>>>>>> given that though, I don't have a strong preference
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net <http://schemas.openid.net>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view,  or do
>>>>>>> you see axshema.org <http://axshema.org> continuing in some way?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>> Dick,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone else
>>>>>>>> contributed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>> Who controls axschema.org <http://axschema.org> now?
>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> I do personally
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>         
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> specs mailing list
>>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090916/d2d31032/attachment.htm>