Attribute Exchange 2.0
Chris Obdam
chris.obdam at holder.nl
Wed Sep 16 12:42:53 UTC 2009
Hi Nat,
This one: http://step2.googlecode.com/svn/spec/attribute_exchange_validate/trunk/openid-attribute-exchange-validate-mode.html
Cheers,
Chris
Op 16 sep 2009, om 13:59 heeft Nat Sakimura het volgende geschreven:
> Yes. Let us reopen.
>
> Which draft do you mean, Chris?
>
> =nat
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Chris Obdam <chris.obdam at holder.nl>
> wrote:
>> Henrik,
>>
>> I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million
>> users.
>>
>> We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data the RP
>> doesn't have to do that much checking anymore.
>>
>> I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-)
>>
>> @henrik Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in a test
>> environment?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>
>>> Chris,
>>> I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year,
>>> but id did
>>> not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from this
>>> session and
>>> from other inputs is that the community in general wants to handle
>>> trust
>>> issues completely out of band (federated approach) - with PAPE as
>>> a partial
>>> exception to the rule.
>>>
>>> Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing
>>> coupled
>>> with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky combination)
>>> I would
>>> be more than happy to have this discussion reopened - as we have
>>> examples
>>> where generic out of band OP-RP trust is clearly not acceptable to
>>> users.
>>>
>>> Henrik Biering
>>> =henrik
>>> @netamia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris Obdam skrev:
>>>>
>>>> John, Allen,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID
>>>> Attribute
>>>> Exchange Validate Mode.
>>>> In this spec there's a validation required per attribute.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/token_via_email
>>>>
>>>> Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email',
>>>> described
>>>> in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else?
>>>> The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore.
>>>>
>>>> And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Chris Obdam
>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende
>>>> geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>> Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled. I don't know of any other
>>>>> list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sxip was driving it, but is no more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using
>>>>> URI from
>>>>> openid.org in AX 1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> John B.
>>>>> On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute
>>>>>> Exchange
>>>>>> 2.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A have some question regards that draft:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> • What is the current state?
>>>>>> • Is there a axschema draft for using this version,
>>>>>> especially the
>>>>>> validation part.
>>>>>> • We want to start validating in Holland with several large
>>>>>> (internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation
>>>>>> bit. Of
>>>>>> course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the
>>>>>> discussion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris Obdam
>>>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> specs mailing list
>>>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> specs mailing list
>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> specs mailing list
>> specs at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
More information about the specs
mailing list