Attribute Exchange 2.0

[Chris Obdam]

Henrik,

I, in a way, also represent a large OP from Holland. ±8 million users.

We want to enable the RP to check the data. Based on that data the RP  
doesn't have to do that much checking anymore.

I declare the discussion hereby opened ;-)

@henrik  Do you already use the AX 2 draft somewhere, maybe in a test  
environment?

Cheers,

Chris

Op 16 sep 2009, om 11:53 heeft Henrik Biering het volgende geschreven:

> Chris,
> I called a session about this at the last IIW in May this year, but  
> id did not attract much interest. The impression, that I got from  
> this session and from other inputs is that the community in general  
> wants to handle trust issues completely out of band (federated  
> approach) - with PAPE as a partial exception to the rule.
>
> Representing an OpenID provider with focus on identity proofing  
> coupled with usercentricity and privacy (indeed a very tricky  
> combination) I would be more than happy to have this discussion  
> reopened - as we have examples where generic out of band OP-RP trust  
> is clearly not acceptable to users.
>
> Henrik Biering
> =henrik
> @netamia
>
>
>
> Chris Obdam skrev:
>> John, Allen,
>>
>> Thank you for your answers. With validation I mean the OpenID  
>> Attribute Exchange Validate Mode.
>> In this spec there's a validation required per attribute.
>>
>>> "openid.ax.validation.email=http://example.org/validation/token_via_email
>>
>> Are there already validation 'types', like 'token_via_email',  
>> described in axschema (draft version?) or somewhere else?
>> The AXSchema Google Group doesn't seem to be very active anymore.
>>
>> And of course: how can I help to start finalizing the draft? :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Chris Obdam
>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
>>
>>
>> Op 15 sep 2009, om 19:43 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Currently the AX 2.0 work is stalled.  I don't know of any other  
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Sxip was driving it, but is no more.
>>>
>>> Some people are using schema form axshema and others are using URI  
>>> from openid.org in AX 1.0.
>>>
>>> John B.
>>> On 2009-09-15, at 12:07 PM, Chris Obdam wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> Is there a different list for the discussion about Attribute  
>>>> Exchange 2.0?
>>>>
>>>> A have some question regards that draft:
>>>>
>>>>    • What is the current state?
>>>>    • Is there a axschema draft for using this version, especially  
>>>> the validation part.
>>>>    • We want to start validating in Holland with several large  
>>>> (internet) companies. And we want to start using the validation  
>>>> bit. Of course this is a draft, maybe we can participate in the  
>>>> discussion?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Chris Obdam
>>>> Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> specs mailing list
>>>> specs at lists.openid.net
>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> specs mailing list
>> specs at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
>>