[OpenID] Content-Type for Key-Value Form response from OP

Andrew Arnott andrewarnott at gmail.com
Sat Oct 31 04:47:18 UTC 2009


I don't know how to make editorial changes to the spec.  So here's the
thread from a year or so ago, suggesting that OP responses containing
Key-Value Form encoding include a content-type header
of application/x-openid-kvf rather than text/plain or whatever else OPs
might arbitrarily choose.

--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre


On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Peter Williams <pwilliams at rapattoni.com>wrote:

> Make an editorial change to a spec, and submit for formal consideration to
> the spec list. Need be only 2 lines long, and the std iana declaration.
> Nobody recalls emails.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 5:45 PM
> To: OpenID List <general at openid.net>
> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Content-Type for Key-Value Form response from OP
>
> Unless I hear any objection then, I'm going to code up my library to
> respond with application/x-openid-kvf as the content-type for Key-Value Form
> encoded messages.
>
> Thanks for the help coming up with this, Martin.
>
> Andrew Arnott
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott at gmail.com
> <mailto:andrewarnott at gmail.com>> wrote:
> (Forwarding to entire list since I hit Reply instead of Reply All).
>
>
> Thanks, Martin.  It sounds like application/x-kvf is better than text/kvf
> then.  Perhaps we can also be more descriptive then as say
> "application/x-openid-kvf"?
>
> Andrew Arnott
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Martin Atkins <mart at degeneration.co.uk
> <mailto:mart at degeneration.co.uk>> wrote:
> Andrew Arnott wrote:
> > In that case, I move that we adopt text/kvf as the official Content-Type
> > for Key-Value Form encoding response messages.
> >
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Sorry I didn't see your messages until now.
>
> I believe the convention for unregistered MIME types is to prefix the
> subtype part with "x-", giving something like text/x-kvf.
>
> However, since the spec mandates UTF-8 for this message format, it may
> be more appropriate to use an "application/" type; text types generally
> support a "charset" attribute allowing the content to be in an arbitrary
> character encoding, which is not appropriate here.
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net<mailto:general at openid.net>
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20091030/334dc376/attachment.htm>


More information about the specs mailing list