No subject
Wed Mar 4 18:19:19 UTC 2009
> Disallowing post responses limits the use of the more verbose<BR>
> extensions (e.g. attribute exchange). While this might be accept=
able<BR>
> for Luke's particular use case, it might leave it unsolved for others.=
<BR>
<BR>
The POST response is a good point and clearly a valid use case, and I think=
it’s supported no matter what we decide to do. It’s possible t=
o build a receiver that handles POST params if they are present, but otherw=
ise serves up the correct cache headers and Javascript to handle the GET. T=
hat would provide a performance boost in the common case, while still being=
fully compatible with the spec.<BR>
<BR>
More information about the specs
mailing list