Request for consideration of AX 2.0 Working Group Charter Proposal

[David Fuelling]

+1

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd prefer to narrow the scope of the WG and keep it focussed on a small
> number of goals.
>
> A separate WG on SREG would be preferred, but I think it is a disservice to
> the community to have two specs having such significant overlap.
> Choice in this case leads to confusion and reluctance to invest. The
> challenge is that those with an investment in SREG now have a propensity to
> see it continue on even though intellectually they can see the advantage of
> a unified spec.
>
> fwiw: I am in an off-site most of this week and won't be able to engage
> significantly until next week.
>
> -- Dick
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20090127/8f6d3543/attachment-0002.htm>