backchannel/endpoint URLs, desired attributes

[SitG Admin]

>Not to be too much of a stickler but I believe we're referring to a 
>specific use case/need for 'salutation' not to be confused with sex, 
>which is not to be confused with gender :-) (although maybe an RP 
>wants all 3!)

I propose that it remain out-of-scope for OpenID whether RP's want to 
have gender or sex.

  . . . seeing another interpretation of that last, I would further 
add that, if a RP wants to have sex with *any* (human) user, there 
are far deeper problems than OpenID will solve.

-Shade is just trying to lighten the mood a bit ;)