Discovery of an OpenID session at an OP
Chris Obdam
chris.obdam at holder.nl
Tue Dec 15 07:45:07 UTC 2009
> I don't want this thread to be taken off course, but for the RP to specify which OPs it supports greatly diminishes the user-centric element of OpenID. The point of OpenID is that I, as a user, can decide who I trust to store my data and provide my identity — rather than having to choose from a specific subset of providers that the RP decides on.
In that list you can always choose for: "Use another OP". Isn't this the same as the nascar principle at the moment?
>
> . . .
>
> To your question about how this can be done — and "getting the Facebook folks involved" — you should read Luke Shepard's post on how Facebook's accomplishes sign-on with Facebook Connect:
>
> http://www.sociallipstick.com/?p=86
> http://www.sociallipstick.com/?p=167
> http://www.sociallipstick.com/?p=189
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Messina
> Open Web Advocate
>
> Personal: http://factoryjoe.com
> Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina
>
> Citizen Agency: http://citizenagency.com
> Diso Project: http://diso-project.org
> OpenID Foundation: http://openid.net
>
> This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20091215/dad0116b/attachment.htm>
More information about the specs
mailing list