Completing the SREG 1.1 specification

Dick Hardt dick.hardt at
Sat Nov 29 08:40:09 UTC 2008

On 28-Nov-08, at 11:28 PM, Martin Atkins wrote:

> I agree that it's not ideal to have both, and in an ideal world  
> everyone
> would use AX, but currently SREG seems to be more widely deployed than
> AX. This working group proposal was motivated not by some desire to
> needlessly perpetuate SREG but rather by actual real-world interop
> problems I've had to deal with as an implementer.
> As long as folks still want to implement SREG, I think it's beneficial
> to have a specification that actually works in practice, which the
> current draft does not.

Agreed. I was checking to see what people want to implement!

If the community is ready to move to AX, then you don't need to do the  

If the community wants both, then it does need to get cleaned up.

> Dick Hardt wrote:
>> A related topic.
>> Wondering what the community thinks of having two specifications for
>> moving around profile data: we have SREG and AX: do we need both?
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at

More information about the specs mailing list