Request for consideration of Working Group Charter Proposal
Sakimura Nat
n-sakimura at nri.co.jp
Wed Dec 24 00:17:06 UTC 2008
Thank you Martin. Yes, that is my intention.
(And thank you for a better wording as well!)
It also is going to help preocessing (such as signing) a portion of the document based on the name space.
=nat
________________________________________
差出人: specs-bounces at openid.net [specs-bounces at openid.net] は Martin Atkins [mart at degeneration.co.uk] の代理
送信日時: 2008年12月24日 6:31
CC: OpenID Specs Mailing List
件名: Re: Request for consideration of Working Group Charter Proposal
Allen Tom wrote:
> Hi Nat - I'm not quite sure what you mean by "class".
>
Nat previously talked about the idea of bundling several attributes
together into a single namespace rather than assigning a URL to each
individual scalar attributes. He referred to it as a "class" though you
might instead want to think of it as a "struct".
As I recall (I can't find the original message right now) the propsal
went something like:
ns.blah=http://example.com/some-struct
blah.field1=xyz
blah.field2=abc
blah.field3=123
This way the URL is only included once, making the overall message shorter.
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
More information about the specs
mailing list