Proposal for Recycling Identifiers in OpenID 2.0
Dick Hardt
dick at sxip.com
Mon May 14 16:12:08 UTC 2007
The issue you bring up is a separate issue then the motivation for
recycling identifiers by large OPs.
Your point is how does a user transfer from one identifier to another.
The issue at hand is the scarcity of namespace.
-- Dick
On 14-May-07, at 8:48 AM, Johannes Ernst wrote:
> These seems to be an assumption on this thread that
> - identifiers at the same domain name get recycled often (e.g.
> example.com/jim)
> - domain names don't get recycled often (e.g example.com itself)
>
> I would suggest that any proposed solution needs to be able to deal
> with domain names as well that aren't being renewed, and picked up
> by somebody else. Somebody who isn't necessarily continuing any
> kind of naming scheme the previous owner had in place, or who is
> actively hostile with respect to the previous owner.
>
> There's a whole industry out there recycling domain names -- which
> proves that this is an issue.
>
>
>
>
> Johannes Ernst
> NetMesh Inc.
>
>
> <openid-relying-party-authenticated.gif>
> <lid.gif>
> http://netmesh.info/jernst
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
More information about the specs
mailing list