DRAFT 11 -> FINAL?
rowan at standardinteractive.com
Wed Jan 31 20:46:12 UTC 2007
On 1/30/07, Josh Hoyt <josh at janrain.com> wrote:
> While it is true that since the link relationship names changed, the
> "openid2" is technically redundant, I think it is much clearer to
> everybody what is going on if the link relationship contains the
> version number. If the protocol version were to keep changing, I'd
> argue for a different solution.
Sure, that's good enough reason. Since html discovery is
not really the preferred method anyway, I don't think the
openid2.* links should stand in the way of finalizing the spec :)
More information about the specs