HTTPS status

Alaric Dailey alaricdailey at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 1 04:41:05 UTC 2007


I was going to sit here and craft a large response with rebuttals for each
of your statements, but... 

At this point I think I have to be contented with the knowledge that OpenId
will be forced to change, or it will fail, this is ESPECIALLY true because
of the sudden surge in popularity.
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: specs-bounces at openid.net 
> [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of Scott Kveton
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 8:33 PM
> To: specs at openid.net
> Subject: Re: HTTPS status
> 
> [snip]
>  
> > Why is there such reluctance?
> 
> I think there are a several reasons why:
> 
> * Not everybody knows how to install/manage an SSL certificate
> * Not every web hosting company allows multiple IP's for sites
> * It wouldn't have been easy to get the adoption we're seeing 
> with a MUST
> * Majority of transactions are low-value today
> 
> Could we have gotten where we are today with the growth that 
> we've seen _with_ a MUST?  I don't think so.
> 
> The providers who are really serious about security and 
> identity will have SSL.
> 
> - Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
> 



More information about the specs mailing list