encoding newlines in attribute values
Douglas Otis
dotis at mail-abuse.org
Thu Apr 19 06:25:17 UTC 2007
On Apr 18, 2007, at 8:31 PM, Marius Scurtescu wrote:
> Base64 encoding is a pretty good candidate for binary data, but you
> cannot apply the same encoding to text fields.
RFC4648 "URL and Filename safe" Base 64 Alphabet might be a good choice.
> Applying base64, or similar encoding appropriate for binary data, to
> text fields has two drawbacks:
> - renders the field unreadable
Binary data is often unreadable.
> - increases the size of the field
Base 64 increases the size of the encoded element by about 30%.
> URL-encoding has the advantage that probably all web frameworks will
> have functions to encode and decode this format.
URL-encoding increases the size of the encoded element by 300%.
-Doug
More information about the specs
mailing list