PROPOSAL schema.openid.net for AX (and other extensions)

Recordon, David drecordon at verisign.com
Mon Apr 9 17:01:02 UTC 2007


Hey Brian.
Just to clarify, I don't think there is disagreement that this should be discussed here.  Rather the question is if discussion should be around creating a new schema on openid.net or rather looking at using an exisiting one such as ldap.com that Mark posted about?  Ie, discussion location aside, do you believe the OpenID project should be creating a new schema of its own?

--David


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brian Hernacki [mailto:brian_hernacki at symantec.com]
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2007 09:48 AM Pacific Standard Time
To:	OpenID specs list
Subject:	Re: PROPOSAL schema.openid.net for AX (and other extensions)


On 4/6/07 6:07 PM, "Dick Hardt" <dick at sxip.com> wrote:
> 
> If anyone implementing would like to do something different, then I'd
> welcome additional discussion, otherwise I think we should be able to
> move forward with the proposal.

For what it's worth, as an implementer...

I think it makes sense to come to agreement within the OpenID community and
get something working first. While I appreciate the issues involved with
having multiple protocols and attribute definitions, I worry that if this
becomes coupled to other efforts it would cause delays. Better to at least
come to that table with a sound version of what we think "works".

Given that, discussing it here (openid.net) seems natural.

--brian

_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20070409/913cf720/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the specs mailing list