Request for comments: Sorting fields in signature generation - Call for votes
Josh Hoyt
josh at janrain.com
Wed Sep 27 19:20:00 UTC 2006
On 9/27/06, Marius Scurtescu <marius at sxip.com> wrote:
> please keep in mind that we are not asking for some fancy new
> technology or feature, just conformance with a very basic an wide
> spread convention of handling parameters in HTTP/HTML.
As Kevin pointed out, we are not working on the HTTP/HTML form
processing specification. We are working on an authentication
protocol. Restricting the protocol to forbid multiple parameters with
the same name does not break conformance with anything.
I think that we have discussed the majority of the technical issues
regarding multiple parameters with the same name. I could respond to
your individual points, but I don't think that would get us any closer
to agreement.
Can we get +1/-1 on multiple parameters with the same name from people
without @sxip.com or @janrain.com e-mail addresses?
Clearly, we (JanRain) are -1.
Josh
More information about the specs
mailing list