[Openid-specs-mobile-profile] MODRNA WG Call on Jan 23rd 2018 preliminary minutes

philippe.clement at orange.com philippe.clement at orange.com
Tue Jan 23 16:44:34 UTC 2018


Dear all,
Please find below the preliminary minutes of our call. Thank you for any update/suggestion in case of any error or misunderstanding

Participants (names captured on the gotomeeting):
-        Bjorn Hjelm (Verizon)
-        Gonzalo (Telefonica)
-        Marianne Grima
-        Petteri Stenius (Ubisecure)
-       Philippe Clement (Orange)
-        Siva(GSMA)

Agenda
*       Roll Call
*       Adoption of the Agenda [Bjorn/John]
*       Liaisons Updates
*       GSMA [Siva]
*       Working Group Updates
*       FAPI WG
*       Issue Tracker
*       Authentication Profile
*       Other
*       AOB

Discussion
*       Roll Call
See participants list
*       Adoption of the Agenda [Bjorn/John]
Agreed
*       Liaisons Updates
*       GSMA [Siva]
         MC discussions have begun on PSD2 requirements. These discussions are framed into the service enabler context inside the CPAS group.
         PSD2 require strong authentication to be done. Specific changes are investigated like request parameters to capture the payment details at the RP. RP can specify different parameters for the request. ID Token will be completed by other parameters, like payment_dlink_token , a Jason object (JWT) to be signed.
         Banks would use MC as a second factor authentication.
         For LOA4, not any more extension is scheduled for the profile, and no specific implementation for PKI.
*       UQ commercial requirement introduced, discussions are going on.
*       Working Group Updates
*       FAPI WG
         open banking WG On Jan 31st.
*       Issue Tracker
*       Authentication Profile
           To be discussed in presence of Jörg
*       CIBA: Capture the open issues for CIBA in a separate email, send them to the group to collect comments for the next call (Gonzalo).
*       Other
*       Petteri captured the issue #62. No report of misuse so far of the questioned parameter. For other operators, seems important and want to keep the parameter. Petteri looked at the Call center and bank Use Cases in CIBA spec. Questions arose regarding the customer care UC, and the fact another people phone number could be submitted.
*       Petteri requests to see more Use Cases. After reading CIBA specs, contradictions seem possible, or impossibility to achieve with the CIBA flow. (Gonzalo to check).
*       --> Lower the priority, keep it open, talk to John to find the best way to move it forward (Björn).
*       AOB
*       Next call: continue with the authentication profile and CIBA issues

Best regards,
Philippe


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-mobile-profile/attachments/20180123/66ebc5da/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-mobile-profile mailing list